ArticlePeerJ2025
Comparison of survival in patients with low
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study of patients with prostate cancer, we explored associations between low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations and disease progression as well as prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 233,554 prostate cancer patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and of 199 prostate cancer patients from the medical records of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University with PSA ≤10 ng/mL at diagnosis. The patients were stratified into eight subgroups by T stage and Gleason score (GS) and survival curves for the resultant subgroups plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox analyses were performed to investigate the effects of PSA concentrations in different subgroups. After randomly dividing patients into a training set and an internal validation set with a ratio of 7:3, a nomogram model to predict the survival of prostate cancer patients was subsequently established and validated. Results: In all prostate cancer patients with Gleason score (GS) 8-10, low PSA concentrations were significantly associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis, functioning as a statistically significant risk factor. Conversely, in patients with GS 6-7 and Stage T1 disease, low PSA concentrations acted as a protective factor. A nomogram model for predicting prognosis was established and validated. We obtained similar results with an external validation cohort. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that low PSA concentrations exert divergent impacts on prostate cancer patients stratified by T stage and GS. Specifically, in patients with high GS (8-10), low PSA concentrations represent a risk factor for disease progression to advanced stages and poor prognosis. Additionally, we developed a novel nomogram that effectively predicts survival outcomes in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.