ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
A detection method for synchronous recognition of string tomatoes and picking points based on keypoint detection.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Keypoint-Based Forest Musk Deer Behavioral Recognition Method.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- An improved YOLOv11n-based method for high-precision detection of ginkgo fruits in complex natural environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Canopy and leaf vein segmentation and topology-guided localization of stem points in tobacco plants using YOLO-ODS.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- ECS-tea: a bio-inspired high-precision detection and localization algorithm for young shoots of Pu-erh tea.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Optimizing polymorphic tomato picking detection: improved YOLOv8n architecture to tackle data under complex environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the greenhouse environment, factors such as variable lighting conditions, the similarity in color between fruit stems and background, and the complex growth posture of string tomatoes lead to low detection accuracy for picking points. This paper proposes a detection method for the synchronous recognition of tomatoes and their picking points based on keypoint detection. Using YOLOv8n-pose as the baseline model, we constructed the YOLOv8-TP model. To reduce the computational load of the model, we replaced the C2f module in the backbone network with the C2f-OREPA module. To enhance the model's accuracy and performance, we introduced a PSA mechanism after the backbone network. Additionally, to strengthen the model's feature extraction capabilities, we incorporated CGAFusion at the end of the Neck, which adaptively emphasizes important features while suppressing less important ones, thereby enhancing feature expressiveness. Experimental results show that the YOLOv8-TP model achieved an accuracy of 89.8% in synchronously recognizing tomatoes and picking points, with an inference speed of 154.7 FPS. The YOLOv8n-pose model achieves an inference speed of 148.6 FPS. Compared to the baseline model, YOLOv8-TP improved precision, mAP@.5, mAP@.5:.95, and F1-score by 0.6%, 1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively, while reducing model complexity by 8.1%. The Euclidean distance error for detecting picking points was less than 25 pixels, and the depth error was less than 3 millimeters. This method demonstrates excellent detection performance and provides a reference model for detecting string tomatoes and their picking points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.