ArticleiScience2025
Aversively conditioned context enhances visual size illusion via stimulus-specific neural networks.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion-perception interaction is a fundamental question in cognitive neuroscience, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we probed this issue by combining fear conditioning paradigm with the classic Ebbinghaus illusion. We associated the surrounding context of the Ebbinghaus illusion with aversive stimuli (electric shock or intense noise) and measured behavioral and neural responses. Behaviorally, aversively conditioned contexts enhanced the perceived size illusion effect, with shock producing a stronger conditioning effect than noise. Neuroimaging revealed distinct neural pathways mediating these effects: shock conditioning strengthened occipital-to-parietal connectivity, while noise conditioning enhanced prefrontal-to-parietal connectivity. Moreover, noise relative to shock conditioning elicited greater activation in both the lateral amygdala (LA) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and weakened LA-to-dlPFC connectivity. The findings suggest that aversive learning experiences shape human visual perception through stimulus-specific neural networks, advancing our understanding of emotion-perception interaction, and providing crucial insights for clinical interventions targeting fear-related perceptual distortions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.