SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
The Role of Cystatin C in the Prediction of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Following Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis the effectiveness nursing interventions for contrast-induced adverse reactions in postoperative general surgery patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) represents a significant cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) and accounts for 11% of all cases. Conventional biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (SCr), present limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the early detection of CI-AKI. Therefore, this review examines the potential of cystatin C (CysC) as a biomarker for predicting CI-AKI in patients undergoing coronary procedures and assesses its effectiveness compared to traditional markers. Methods: This systematic review was conducted using PubMed to identify studies published between January 2020 and March 2025. The inclusion criteria focused on original studies examining CysC levels for early CI-AKI detection in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data extraction followed a standardized charting method, focusing on key findings from the selected studies. Results: A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 410 articles, with data extracted from these seven prospective studies. Key findings indicated that elevated preoperative CysC levels correlated with a higher risk of developing CI-AKI, demonstrating greater sensitivity and specificity than the conventional SCr biomarker. The mean cut-off values for CysC varied across studies, but consistent trends highlighted its potential as an early indicator of renal dysfunction. Conclusions: CysC appears to be a more sensitive biomarker than SCr for the early detection of CI-AKI. This review suggests that integrating CysC measurement into clinical practice could enhance the early diagnosis and management of CI-AKI, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Hence, future research should focus on standardizing CysC cut-off values and further explore their implications in broader clinical settings and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.