ArticleJournal of diversity in higher education2023
Counterspaces as a Site of Network Formation within Academia.
Article in Journal of diversity in higher education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Within higher education, professional networks are critical to faculty success. Prior research on the networks of faculty belonging to marginalized groups has taken a deficit model perspective, focusing on limited access to and structural exclusion from professional networks. We counter this deficit perspective, shifting the research to examine how network ties-the relationships between individuals within a network-form within counterspaces. Counterspaces are settings in which individuals belonging to systemically marginalized groups exchange support and share resources. Using interview data, we find the interactions occurring within the counterspace setting of the Broadening the Representation of Academic Investigators in NeuroScience (BRAINS) program allowed participants to recognize their shared values around diversity, equity, and inclusion, which in turn facilitated the formation of trusting network ties. In addition, we find that the development of these network ties positively impacted interviewees' understanding of and approach to networks and networking beyond the BRAINS counterspace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.