ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Self-efficacy centered comprehensive interventions and effects in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the effect of perioperative nursing intervention for esophageal cancer patients based on the ADOPT nursing model.Medicine · 2026Article
- Association between nutritional literacy and cancer anorexia among gastrointestinal cancer patients: a moderated mediation analysis on the roles of self-efficacy and family support.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Health beliefs and quality of life in patients with gastric cancer: the chain mediating role of nutritional behaviors and nutritional status.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effects of self-efficacy theory centered comprehensive interventions on perioperative nutritional status, self-management ability, self-efficacy perception, and quality of life in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer. Methods: Using a convenience sampling method, 213 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at a tertiary specialized hospital in Sichuan Province from October 2023 to April 2024 were selected as the research subjects for randomized controlled trial. The selected patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group with 107 cases and the control group with 106 cases. The experimental group received self-efficacy centered comprehensive interventions including dietary guidance, psychological intervention and counseling, symptom management, exercise guidance, etc. The control group received routine medical interventions. The nutritional status, self-efficacy, self-management ability, and quality of life of the two groups of patients were evaluated at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after discharge from hospital. Results: The analytical outcomes across diverse time intervals demonstrated that the nutritional risk of patients in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group, while the self-efficacy scale, self-management ability scale, and quality of life scores in the experimental group were all higher than those in the control group. The differences were statistically significant ( Conclusion: Comprehensive interventions centered on self-efficacy theory can improve the nutritional status, self-efficacy, self-management ability, and quality of life of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.