ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Insights Into Cigarette Litigation From a Career Tobacco Dependence Physician: The Florida Engle Trials.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this commentary is to better inform physicians about the often-unrecognized consequences of cigarette smoking. It highlights knowledge gained from involvement in over 70 legal cases between smokers and cigarette companies in the Florida Engle Trials. As a physician with many years of experience in treating nicotine addiction, the author participated as a paid expert witness in these cases, 45 of which went to trial. Depositions included family members and close associates of the smoker, which allowed the gathering of voluminous information not usually available to a physician. This provided a level of insight into the suffering experienced that was illuminating. Based on this experience as an expert witness, 3 cases are presented that are clear examples of the tragedy experienced by smokers and their families. While not randomly selected, they are representative of the cases in which I participated. The impact of cigarettes on both smokers and those around them is difficult to quantify and is often not observable by healthcare professionals. The documented attitudes of cigarette lawyers, as seen in depositions and at trials, demonstrate an incredible lack of empathy and compassion. On the other hand, the cigarette companies are completely aware that almost 500 000 Americans die each year from use of their products, but death is only 1 outcome. What a sad commentary on the companies that knowingly perpetuated this epidemic and the lawyers who continue to defend them. Sadly, to both parties, it isn't about the pain, suffering, morbidity, and death that these products cause. Rather, it is simply about money and staying in business on the one hand and money and winning on the other. However, the paramount lesson learned for all of us who take care of smoking patients is first to help them stop smoking and second to appreciate the wide-reaching ramifications of their tobacco dependence. Taking this empathic approach to their care will go a long way to demonstrating the compassion that is needed to provide a healing environment for the patient, their family, and loved ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.