ArticleOncology reports2025
Comprehensive genetic profiling using tissue and blood in locally advanced tumors.
Article in Oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- KLF2 as a prognostic and potential therapeutic target associated with ferroptosis in serous ovarian cancer: An integrative bioinformatics and clinical validation study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Advancing gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review of circulating tumor DNA in gastrointestinal malignancies.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) aims to assist clinicians with the diagnosis, treatment decisions and early detection of recurrence in patients with cancer. CGP using tumor tissue is widely implemented, whereas circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is a noninvasive method that uses peripheral blood. This pilot study included eight patients with locally advanced tumors (two each of breast, lung, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers). The concordance of somatic variants with tumor tissues and paired ctDNA from pre‑ and post‑resection samples was evaluated. This study demonstrated that the overall concordance rate in all genes between tissue and postoperative blood was high (94.2%), but the concordance rate in genes with somatic variants was low (4.76%). In patient 8 with head and neck cancer, the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.