Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40776739›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2026

Attachment, Perceived Partner Phubbing, and Retaliation: A Daily Diary Study.

Katherine B Carnelley, Claire M Hart, Laura M Vowels, Tessa Thejas Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine B CarnelleyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-8576
Claire M HartUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Laura M VowelsFAmily and DevelOpment Research Center (FADO), Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tessa Thejas ThomasUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

the School of Psychology, University of Southampton
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe conducted a diary study to investigate the role of adult attachment on responses to daily perceived partner phubbing in a sample of couple members (N = 196).

methodWe focused on personal and relational well-being as well as reactions to phubbing, retaliation reports, and motives as outcomes.

resultsResults showed that on days when participants perceived their partner as phubbing them more, participants higher in attachment anxiety reported higher depressed mood and lower self-esteem; however, their relationship satisfaction was not impacted. In response to partner phubbing, participants higher in attachment anxiety reported more resentment, curiosity, and retaliation in response to phubbing. When retaliating to phubbing, those higher in attachment anxiety did so to seek support and approval from others, whereas those higher in attachment avoidance did so to gain approval from others.

conclusionsOur findings contribute to the understanding of how adult attachment patterns influence people's responses to partners' phubbing and well-being.

Indexed as

AnxietyInterpersonal RelationsObject AttachmentPersonal SatisfactionSelf ConceptSpousesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultattachmentdaily diaryphubbingrelationship satisfactionretaliation

Identifiers

PMID40776739
PMCPMC13163619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.