ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2025
Point-of-care ultrasound competency of doctors working in Cape Town emergency departments.
Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a core competency in emergency medicine, and its use in other primary healthcare settings is growing. The study investigates the PoCUS competency, training and qualifications of doctors working in public emergency departments.
methodsAn online survey was distributed to doctors at five public Cape Town emergency departments, followed by a practical assessment of an Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) and a basic cardiac ultrasound examination. Descriptive and inferential statistics are presented.
resultsAll participants had attended an in-person PoCUS course before, and 45 (83.3%) were trained by supervisors at work. Eleven participants (20.4%) were credentialled. In the practical assessment, 73.5% were rated as competent in eFAST and 55.9% in basic cardiac ultrasound. The median scores were 80.4% (eFAST) and 76.9% (cardiac ultrasound). Credentialled participants were more likely to achieve a pass mark ( 60%) in eFAST (p 0.001) and cardiac ultrasound (p 0.001).
conclusionAll the emergency department doctors who use PoCUS had received formal PoCUS training, and the majority of PoCUS providers had an adequate skill level in the applications tested. The credentialled providers performed better overall. There is a need for further research to investigate the persistently low credentialling rate and potential solutions, not only among practitioners in emergency departments but also generalists and primary care practitioners.Contribution: Our study provides a unique snapshot of the PoCUS skills of junior doctors and trainees in public Cape Town emergency departments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.