Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40776714›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2025

Usage of traditional medicine during pregnancy and the associated factors among Basotho women.

Lisemelo L Chesetsi, Andrew Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisemelo L ChesetsiDepartment of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban. 215078476@stu.ukzn.ac.za.
Andrew Ross

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany women persist in using traditional medicine despite the evidence that traditional medicines have the potential to harm both the unborn baby and the mother. Data on the extent of use of traditional medicine by women in Lesotho during pregnancy are largely unavailable.

aimThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of traditional medicine use during pregnancy among Basotho women and identify the associated factors.

settingThe study took place in Ha-Shalabeng, Ha-Molengoane and Ha-Setoko, Lesotho.

methodsA cross-sectional design was adopted, data were collected through a structured questionnaire, coded into Excel, and analysed using SPSS. Frequency distribution tables and graphs were used to describe the data on women. The χ2 test examined the association between categorical dependent and independent variables.

resultsThe prevalence of traditional medicine use during pregnancy was 40%. The factors significantly influencing traditional medicine use, included age (p  0.01), educational level (p  0.01), location (p  0.01), transport availability (p  0.04), belief in the efficacy of traditional medicine (p  0.01), reasons for the type of care (p  0.01) and recommendations from parents (p  0.03).

conclusionThe utilisation of traditional medicine during pregnancy was found to be high. Therefore, it is crucial to have a policy in Lesotho that regulates the usage and safety of traditional medicine. Contribution: The data would be crucial in informing future research and shaping the development and implementation of traditional medicine policy, thus addressing the existing policy gap regarding traditional medicine in Lesotho.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedicine, African TraditionalPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLesothoPregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultLesothopregnancyprevalencetraditional medicinewomen

Identifiers

PMID40776714
PMCPMC12339889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.