Trial reportCurrent neuropharmacology2026
A Prospective Clinical Trial of Efgartigimod for New-Onset Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.
Trial report in Current neuropharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimal Symptom Expression in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Valuable Patient-Centric Treatment Goal.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Heterogeneous response to efgartigimod in real-world experience with myasthenia gravis: Predictors and treatment strategies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance analysis of FcRn antagonists in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: A disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNumerous studies have demonstrated that efgartigimod is effective in treating myasthenia gravis (MG) across various patient populations. However, there is limited evidence regarding its use in patients with new-onset acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized MG (AChR-gMG). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the real-world safety and effectiveness of efgartigimod in Chinese patients with new-onset anti-cholinergic receptor (AChR)- gMG.
methodsThis prospective study was conducted in 29 patients with new-onset AChR-gMG, with a three-month follow-up. The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score, prednisone dose, laboratory data, and adverse events were assessed at every follow-up visit.
resultsAt 4, 8, and 12 weeks, the mean change in MG-ADL scores was 8.13 ± 3.66, 7.41 ± 4.22, and 6.37 ± 4.67, respectively. Compared with the baseline, 96% (28/29) of patients achieved an MG-ADL response (defined as a decrease of ≥2 points), with a mean response time of 0.81 ± 0.53 weeks (5.67 ± 3.71 days). After one cycle, 52% (15/29) of patients achieved minimal symptom expression (MSE), while 41% maintained MSE at 12 weeks. Moreover, 89% and 72% of MG-ADL responders sustained for 8 and 12 consecutive weeks, respectively. Additionally, patients with thymomatous MG exhibited a poorer response to efgartigimod and required two infusion cycles. All patients were able to reduce their daily steroid dose, and the mean daily prednisone dose decreased by 10.73 mg per day. The treatment was well tolerated, and a few mild adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: These results demonstrate the clinical significance of efgartigimod in patients with newonset AChR-gMG, achieving rapid symptom relief and steroid reduction. Additionally, the potential of efgartigimod to serve as a bridge treatment, facilitating a steady transition to long-term conventional immunosuppressive therapy, was demonstrated. Due to limitations in this study, such as a small sample size, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to validate.
conclusionOur study showed that efgartigimod is clinically beneficial and offers rapid symptom control in patients with new-onset AChR-gMG. A more aggressive application of efgartigimod in combination with corticosteroids may lead to a smoother therapeutic transition, which will further maintain favorable conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.