Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40776489›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2025

Teamwork Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling.

Peida Zhan, Zhimou Wang, Gaohong Chu, Haixin Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peida ZhanSchool of Psychology, https://ror.org/01vevwk45Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua City, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6890-7691
Zhimou WangSchool of Psychology, https://ror.org/01vevwk45Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua City, China.
Gaohong ChuSchool of Psychology, https://ror.org/01vevwk45Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua City, China.
Haixin QiaoSchool of Psychology, https://ror.org/01vevwk45Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua City, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teamwork relies on collaboration to achieve goals that exceed individual capabilities, with team cognition playing a key role by integrating individual expertise and shared understanding. Identifying the causes of inefficiencies or poor team performance is critical for implementing targeted interventions and fostering the development of team cognition. This study proposes a teamwork cognitive diagnostic modeling framework comprising 12 specific models-collectively referred to as Team-CDMs-which are designed to capture the interdependence among team members through emergent team cognitions by jointly modeling individual cognitive attributes and a team-level construct, termed

Indexed as

CognitionCooperative BehaviorGroup ProcessesPsychometricsComputer SimulationHumanscognitive diagnosiscollaborative problem-solvingdiagnostic classification modelteam cognitionteamwork

Identifiers

PMID40776489
PMCPMC12659997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.