Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775778›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Associations between transcranial direct current stimulation session exposure and clinical outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional analysis exploring the role of pain catastrophizing.

Ravi Shankar Reddy, Jaya Shanker Tedla, Shaker Hassan S Alshehri, Faisal M Alyazedi, Suhail Mansour Aljehani, Feras Ahmed Alarabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ravi Shankar ReddyProgram of Physical Therapy, Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia. rshankar@kku.edu.sa.
Jaya Shanker TedlaProgram of Physical Therapy, Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia. jtedla@kku.edu.sa.
Shaker Hassan S AlshehriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal M AlyazediPhysical Therapy Department, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Suhail Mansour AljehaniProgram of Physical Therapy, Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Feras Ahmed AlarabiProgram of Physical Therapy, Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Salman Center for Disability Research, Saudi Arabia KSRG-2024-187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder characterized by chronic pain, reduced physical function, and impaired quality of life. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory intervention, yet limited evidence exists regarding its association with clinical outcomes and the role of psychological mediators in this population. This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between tDCS parameters (number of sessions, stimulation intensity, and duration) and clinical outcomes-pain, functional disability, and quality of life-in individuals with KOA, and explored whether pain catastrophizing mediates these associations.

methodsSixty-eight participants diagnosed with KOA and treated with tDCS were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS), and EQ-5D-5 L index. Pain catastrophizing was measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Pearson correlations, multiple linear regression, and mediation analysis using the PROCESS macro were performed. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe number of tDCS sessions showed significant correlations with reduced pain (r = - 0.42, p = 0.002), improved function (r = 0.39, p = 0.004), and better quality of life (r = 0.44, p = 0.001). Regression analysis showed that the number of tDCS sessions was significantly associated with NPRS (β = - 0.36, p = 0.004), KOOS-PS (β = 0.33, p = 0.005), and EQ-5D-5 L (β = 0.42, p = 0.001). Pain catastrophizing partially mediated these associations, with significant indirect effects observed for all outcomes (p < 0.05).

conclusionHigher tDCS session frequency was correlated with favorable clinical outcomes in KOA, and pain catastrophizing showed statistical evidence of an indirect association, though no causal mediation can be inferred. These findings highlight the importance of considering psychological factors in neuromodulatory treatment planning.

Indexed as

CatastrophizationOsteoarthritis, KneePain ManagementTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeKnee osteoarthritisMediation analysisPain catastrophizingPhysical functionQuality of lifeTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40775778
PMCPMC12330121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.