ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Community health workers for mental health care in refugee camps: a scoping review.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building Capacity in Crisis: Evaluating a Health Assistant Training Program for Young Rohingya Refugee Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIn recent years, countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region have seen a rise in immigration, driven by global conflicts, leading to increased prevalence of physical and mental health issues among refugees. This places significant demands on both refugees and healthcare professionals encountering them in various situations. The analysis considers the social and psychological implications of relying on specialized trainers versus the refugees themselves to determine the most effective and sustainable method for providing mental health support in challenging refugee camp environments.
methodsThis article uses a scoping review methodology to compare the impact of two approaches for addressing mental health needs in refugee camps. Drawing upon previous studies, the research investigates the effectiveness and sustainability of recruiting external experts versus empowering refugees as mental health trainers within their communities.
resultsThe analysis suggests that in refugee camps, empowering refugees as mental health trainers within their communities yields more sustainable and culturally appropriate mental health support compared to recruiting external experts. This approach fosters community resilience and addresses the unique social and psychological needs of refugees in challenging camp environments.
conclusionUltimately, this analysis demonstrates the context-specific nature of health interventions in refugee camps. Empowering refugees as mental health trainers emerges as a promising approach to addressing mental health needs sustainably and effectively within these environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.