ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Pathfinder studies: a novel tool for process mapping data-driven health research to build global research capacity.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is vast global inequality regarding where health research happens, who leads the research, and who benefits from the evidence. Globally, wealthier nations drive and influence data-driven research and how it is structured institutionally. Key barriers to high-quality research being undertaken in and led by low-resource settings are well reported. These barriers persist, thereby perpetuating a lack of locally generated data and/or evidence to tackle diseases that bring the greatest burden. Our aim was to design a tool to capture best practices in the production of data-driven health research, to advance both quality and quantity of research being conducted where it is needed most.
methodsAn expert group of senior global health researchers from Asia, Africa, Europe, and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) convened to discuss potential solutions to addressing this imbalance in both quality and quantity of global health research. This study documents how a novel approach was developed, informed by this discussion, to support research teams in low-resource settings. The new approach, called "Pathfinder", is a process-mapping tool wherein teams document key steps of their research projects flow to produce quality data and subsequent studies.
resultsThe Pathfinder methodology is a novel tool to be used alongside planned studies to guide teams through each step of their research, from setting their research question, to identifying the best methods needed to complete each step, to translating research outputs into impactful policy and practice. It is a standardized framework, which can be applied or adapted to specific settings for research teams track to key steps, challenges, solutions, and tools throughout their planned study's process. Pathfinders can also be applied to studies that have already been completed, retroactively documenting their key components. Several global research institutes are piloting the Pathfinder methodology.
conclusionsPathfinders can help inform future studies by capturing best practices, thereby removing barriers to research, and addressing global inequality in this domain. Specifically, Pathfinders can help identify the methods and skills needed for teams to produce safe, ethical, and accurate data-driven health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.