ArticleGenome medicine2025
Building digital histology models of transcriptional tumor programs with generative deep learning for pathology-based precision medicine.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A conceptual blueprint for "turning cold to hot" in Osteosarcoma: from TME stratification hypotheses to adaptive therapeutic prospects.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Building digital histology models of transcriptional tumor programs with generative deep learning for pathology-based precision medicine.Genome medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrecision oncology depends on identifying the biological vulnerabilities of a tumor. Molecular assays, like transcriptomics, provide an information-rich view of the tumor that can be leveraged to inform therapeutic selection. However, the costs of such assays can be prohibitive for clinical translation at scale. Histology-based imaging remains a predominant means of diagnosis that is widely accessible. To more broadly leverage limited molecular datasets, models have been trained to use histology to infer the expression of individual genes or pathways, with varying levels of accuracy and explainability.
methodsOur approach detects expression of transcriptional programs from tumor histology and interprets the image features supporting program detection. Specifically, we used RNA-seq data from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients to infer cohesive expression patterns of multiple genes. Then, we used deep learning techniques to train a computational model to predict the activity levels of the transcriptional programs directly from histology images. We exploited that predictive capability to generate synthetic digital models of the cellular histology of each transcriptional program, using generative adversarial networks to isolate image features supporting specific transcriptional predictions and pathologist review to interpret the images.
resultsApplying our histologically integrated latent space analysis to SCCs revealed sets of genes associated with both pathologist-interpretable image features and clinically relevant processes, including immune response, collagen remodeling, and fibrosis, going beyond predictions of individual molecular features.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate an approach for discovering clinically interpretable histological features that indicate molecular, potentially treatment-informing, biological processes. These features are detectable in widely available histology slides, allowing a standard microscope to deliver complex, patient-specific molecular information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.