ArticleBMC urology2025
Urethral self-insertion of foreign body; a peculiar doorway to a psychiatric diagnosis: a case report.
Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelf-insertion of foreign bodies into the genitourinary tract is a rare but critical emergency, often underreported due to patient embarrassment. Such presentations may mask underlying psychiatric disorders, including acute psychotic episodes. This case report highlights a unique instance of urethral self-insertion of a plastic and metallic cable, which ultimately led to the diagnosis of schizophrenia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old man with no prior medical or psychiatric history presented with acute penile pain of three hours' duration. On examination, the patient remained calm, and a plastic cable was visibly protruding from the urethral meatus. A plain pelvic X-ray revealed a 9-cm radio-opaque foreign body along the urethral tract. After administering tetanus prophylaxis, the foreign bodies were successfully extracted under local anesthesia. Postoperatively, the patient experienced only mild urethrorrhagia and resumed normal urination. Given the unusual nature of the self-injurious behavior, a psychiatric evaluation was performed, which revealed an acute psychotic episode leading to a diagnosis of schizophrenia.
conclusionThis case underscores the necessity for prompt urological intervention to prevent complications such as infection and urethral strictures, as well as the importance of thorough psychiatric evaluation in patients presenting with self-insertion injuries. A multidisciplinary approach integrating both acute physical management and long-term psychiatric care is essential to optimize outcomes and prevent recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.