ArticleBMC nursing2025
The effect of religious coping and prosocial behaviors on secondary traumatic stress in nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Posttraumatic stress symptoms in trauma-exposed plateau children and adolescents: associations with resilience and prosocial behaviour.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Predictors of Secondary Traumatic Stress among Oncology Nurses in Palestine.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses are routinely exposed to traumatic events as part of their professional duties, placing them at risk of developing secondary traumatic stress (STS). This condition can negatively impact both their psychological well-being and job performance. Although religious coping strategies and prosocial behaviors are thought to play a protective role against STS, these effects remain understudied in the literature.
methodsThis descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 516 nurses. Data were collected between April and August 2024 using the 'Sociodemographic Data Form', Religious Coping Scale', "Prosocial Behavior Scale" and "Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale". In the study, hierarchical regression analysis was applied to examine the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable.
results58.6% of the nurses were between the ages of 18-31, 58.4% were undergraduate graduates, and 82.6% had experienced a traumatic event. The mean score of prosocial behavior was 3.04 ± 0.63 and the mean score of secondary traumatic stress was 48.98 ± 13.52. Positive religious coping (mean = 20.02 ± 4.31) showed a moderate negative correlation with secondary traumatic stress (r=-0.563, p = 0.001). Hierarchical regression revealed that religious coping strategies (positive and negative religious coping) alone explained 31.8% of the variance in secondary traumatic stress (R²=0.318), and when prosocial behavior was added, this percentage increased to 33.9%.
conclusionsThis study highlights the critical role of positive religious coping and prosocial behavior in reducing secondary traumatic stress among nurses frequently exposed to traumatic events. Positive religious coping emerged as the strongest protective factor, while prosocial behavior also contributed significantly to the reduction of stress levels. Strengthening positive coping mechanisms and promoting prosocial behaviors may be effective strategies to support nurses' mental health and resilience in trauma intensive care settings. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Positive religious coping and prosocial behaviors were found to be effective in reducing nurses' secondary traumatic stress. It is recommended that training and support programmes that support nurses' positive coping skills should be expanded in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.