ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Automated detection of wrist ganglia in MRI using convolutional neural networks.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate feasibility of a method which combines segmenting convolutional neural networks (CNN) for the automated detection of ganglion cysts in 2D MRI of the wrist. The study serves as proof-of-concept, demonstrating a method to decrease false positives and offering an efficient solution for ganglia detection.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 58 MRI studies with wrist ganglia, each including 2D axial, sagittal, and coronal series. Manual segmentations were performed by a radiologist and used to train CNNs for automatic segmentation of each orthogonal series. Predictions were fused into a single 3D volume using a proposed prediction fusion method. Performance was evaluated over all studies using six-fold cross-validation, comparing method variations with metrics including true positive rate, number of false positives, and F-score metrics.
resultsThe proposed method reached mean TPR of 0.57, mean FP of 0.4 and mean F-score of 0.53. Fusion of series predictions decreased the number of false positives significantly but also decreased TPR values.
conclusionCNNs can detect ganglion cysts in wrist MRI. The number of false positives can be decreased by a method of prediction fusion from multiple CNNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.