ArticleBMC public health2025
Development of a health support competence scale for supervisors of female migrant workers in Japan.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSupervisors of female migrant workers are expected to support their health, as migrant workers play a vital role in Japan's economic development. However, this support relies on supervisors' experience and efforts. Enhancing their competence can improve the quality of support. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate the Health Support Competence Scale for Supervisors of Female migrant workers (HSCSS-F) to assess their competence in providing health support.
methodsThe cross-sectional study was conducted in two steps (i.e., preliminary and main studies) using a self-administered questionnaire. In total, 3,401 eligible supervisors were approached across Japan. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. For concurrent validity, the correlation between the HSCSS-F and the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS) or the Health-oriented Leadership Staff-Care Value (HoL Staff-Care Value) was determined.
resultsThe study extracted 22 items, which categorized into three factors, namely, health support through human resource development or cultural respect, and support for disease prevention and health promotion. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a model that fit the data well, with a goodness of fit index = 0.903, adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.881, comparative fit index of 0.909, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.068. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.925 confirmed internal consistency. The total HSCSS-F score was significantly positively correlated with score for ISS (r = 0.502, p < 0.001) or the HoL Staff-Care Value (r = 0.463, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe HSCSS-F is a reliable and valid scale. It could provide supervisors not only with an appropriate assessment of support for the health of female migrant workers but also with a course of action. The acquisition and development of competence in the health support by supervisors would contribute to a healthy life for female migrant workers in a host country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.