ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2025
Unraveling the Potential of ctDNA in Precision Medicine for Breast Cancer.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of ctDNA in breast cancer - present utility and future perspectives.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in Drug Delivery Systems for Breast Cancer: From Microenvironment Barriers and Smart Carriers to Clinical Translation Strategies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- LncRNAs as regulators of chemoresistance and chemosensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a minimally invasive and dynamic tool for providing real-time genetic insights into solid tumors, including breast cancer. Circulating tumor DNA is released into the bloodstream through apoptosis, necrosis, or active secretion, and it reflects tumor heterogeneity, which continues to be a major challenge in breast cancer treatment. Advances in high-sensitivity technologies, such as next-generation sequencing and digital polymerase chain reaction, have enabled the detection of key genetic alterations, offering applications in early diagnosis, monitoring minimal residual disease, identifying drug resistance mechanisms, and predicting relapse. Some circulating tumor DNA-based tests have already received regulatory approval for clinical use in patients with breast cancer, and additional studies are underway to expand their applicability. However, low concentrations of circulating tumor DNA and the necessity for standardization across different platforms remain a challenge for the expanded application. In this review, we present an overview of the genetic variants detected in circulating tumor DNA from patients with breast cancer, emphasizing their potential utility in guiding personalized therapeutic strategies and predicting treatment responses across the diverse molecular subtypes of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40775578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.