Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775541›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

The cost of re-synchronization in a leaf-cutter ant colony.

Mila Maria Pamplona-Barbosa, Marcelo Arruda Fiuza de Toledo, Gisele Akemi Oda, André Frazão Helene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mila Maria Pamplona-BarbosaDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. mmpb@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-6344
Marcelo Arruda Fiuza de ToledoInstituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas (HCFM), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-0354
Gisele Akemi OdaDepartment of Physiology, Biosciences Institute of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
André Frazão HeleneDepartment of Physiology, Biosciences Institute of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological rhythms are essential components of organisms' physiology and behavior. In social insects, biological rhythms can be studied at varying levels of a colony, revealing interesting aspects about how rhythms arise from the individual and collective levels. Here, by developing a video-tracking software based on machine learning techniques, we investigated the emergent collective rhythms of a leaf-cutter ant colony under laboratory conditions. The colony displayed rhythmic, daily foraging activity, with most of its foraging occurring during the dark phase of the day. The same pattern is found in the leaf-cutting activity. After being exposed to a 6-hour phase shift of the light-dark cycle, the daily rhythm of colony activity resynchronized with the new cycle phase after a few transient days. During these transient days, an increase in its daily leaf intake was measured. Under synchronized conditions, the ratio between foraging and leaf intake of the colony was higher during the light phase and decreased in the transient days after the phase shift, revealing that temporal synchronization plays an important role in the organization of the colony. Our findings illustrate the dynamic aspects of temporal synchronization in complex eusocial systems, pointing to these systems as exciting new models for comparative research.

Indexed as

AntsBehavior, AnimalCircadian RhythmAnimalsFeeding BehaviorPhotoperiodPlant LeavesSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID40775541
PMCPMC12332190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.