ReviewGene therapy2026
Visualising treatment effects in low-vision settings: proven and potential endpoints for clinical trials of inherited retinal disease therapies.
Review in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Volume Assessment Using Linear Mixed Model in Moderate and Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Gene-Agnostic Therapeutic Strategies for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Neuroprotection and Immunomodulation.Genes · 2026Review
- Functional methods for evaluating the efficacy of retinal optogenetic therapy for vision restoration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Article
- Advantages of human opsins in optogenetic visual restoration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inherited retinal diseases are a devasting and incurable cause of blindness which frequently affect patients at a young age, and developing effective treatments has been an important research priority in recent decades. Treatments must be validated in randomised-control trials, which involve measuring benefit according to prospectively defined endpoints. A wide variety of conventional clinical endpoints and emerging anatomical, physiological, and functional biomarkers may be selected. Different options may be better or worse at capturing clinically significant differences and identifying real differences between experimental groups. This review provides an overview of some proven and potential endpoints for randomised-control trials involving inherited retinal disease patients. Clinical endpoints and biomarkers are discussed, and the work required to validate biomarkers for use in trials is outlined. Unlike in general medicine, ophthalmological clinical endpoints may all be conceptualised as surrogates for maintained vision. Selecting optimal endpoints is essential to ensure that treatments are assessed fairly, such that resources are directed towards interventions that stand to truly benefit patients with inherited retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.