ArticleScientific reports2025
CRxK dataset: a multi-view surveillance video dataset for re-enacted crimes in Korea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce a novel benchmark dataset, CRxK Dataset, featuring surveillance images based on meticulously re-enacted crime events with curated annotations. CRxK dataset includes a collection of crime re-enacted videos and images categorized into 13 different categories, encompassing a set of offenses such as assault, intoxication, swoon, and more. In addition, we cover a separate normal dataset extracted from scenes occurring five seconds before the crime event and spanning a 10-second duration. Among 13 categories, we employ six core categories, which are the most frequent occurrences in the collected dataset. These categories are assault, robbery, swooning, kidnapping, burglary, and normal scenarios. We conducted experiments using a total of 2,054,013 frames randomly selected and shuffled from the videos. Our training and validation involved four convolutional neural network (CNN) models and a single transformer model. We utilized a smaller sub-dataset, CRxK-6 dataset, containing 8,500 frames randomly sampled from each category video, resulting in 51,000 frames. Despite employing a train-test split ratio of 1:40 and applying face masking using RetinaFace, the dataset exhibited excellent performance with common CNN models, achieving an accuracy exceeding 0.940 for each model. However, it presented some challenges for the Transformer model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.