Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775507›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of degradation and time of sampling on gut Microbiome composition in wild-caught marine fish.

Yufei Zhou, Alejandro Trujillo-González, Simon Nicol, Marion Boutigny, Roger Huerlimann, Stephen D Sarre, Dianne Gleeson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yufei ZhouCentre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, EcoDNA group, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia. Yufei.zhou@canberra.edu.au.
Alejandro Trujillo-GonzálezCentre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, EcoDNA group, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Simon NicolCentre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, EcoDNA group, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Marion BoutignyOceanic Fisheries Programme, Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Roger HuerlimannMarine Climate Change Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan.
Stephen D SarreCentre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, EcoDNA group, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Dianne GleesonCentre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, EcoDNA group, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari Street, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.

Funding

the Pacific Community FED/2018/397-941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome has the potential to be an effective indicator of individual and population health in fish given its sensitivity to internal and external stressors. However, without consistent and tested validated sampling protocols, the gut microbiome’s potential as a reliable indicator may be limited. Routine sampling of wild free-living fish caught by commercial fisheries rarely occurs at the time of capture and more commonly occurs hours, days, or weeks after fish capture when the catch is unloaded in port. This delay in sampling provides time for the degradation and decomposition of the microbiome community potentially compromising the reliability of gut microbiome analyses. Unfortunately, comprehensive and systematic analyses on post-capture changes in the gut microbiome communities of wild marine fish are lacking, limiting the reliability of microbiome studies. Here, we investigated the post-mortem changes in the gut microbiome of one wild-caught marine fish, skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis), at five different time points (immediately, 2 h, 24 h, 12 days, and 24 days after fish capture). The decomposition of the gut microbiome community occurred within the first 24 h if the samples were not preserved immediately. Over time, the relative abundance of Vibrionaceae decreased while Bradyrhizobiaceae increased, indicating the potential of these two families to serve as gut microbiome degradation indicators. Our findings highlight the importance of timely preservation in gut microbiome studies of wild-caught fish. Without appropriate preservation, both the diversity of the gut microbiome and the relative abundance of key microbial families change significantly within 24 h. To obtain reliable and representative results, we recommend preserving gut samples as soon as possible after capture, ideally within two hours, and no later than 24 h.s.

Indexed as

FishesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeTunaAnimalsAnimals, WildBacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecimen HandlingTime FactorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SGut microbiomeKatsuwonus pelamisMicrobiome degradationSample preservationWild-caught fish

Identifiers

PMID40775507
PMCPMC12331957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.