Trial reportScientific reports2025
Efficacy of the power centering for seniors intervention on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04861831 (Power Centering for Seniors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Power Centering for Seniors: A Multimodal Intervention to Improve Mobility and Quality of Life in Older Adults
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintaining physical function and mobility is essential for older adults to preserve independence, reduce fall risk, and minimise dependence on care. "Power Centering for Seniors" (PCS) is a mindfulness-based, proprioceptive training programme combining Tai Chi and Qi Gong with functional strength and balance practices. This study assessed the efficacy of the PCS programme on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults. The study included 57 participants aged 70 years or older, randomised into an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The PCS intervention consisted of 24 supervised sessions over 12 weeks, with additional home exercises. Physical functional performance was measured using the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance 10 (CS-PFP-10) test, focusing on the subdomain Lower Body Strength and Balance & Coordination. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the data, adjusting for baseline CS-PFP-10 scores, sex, and age. Fifty-one participants completed the study. The PCS intervention led to non-significant improvements in the CS-PFP-10 total score compared to the CG, with an adjusted difference of 2.05 points (95% CI: -0.78 to 4.89; p = 0.163; Cohen's d = 0.403). Similar trends were observed in the sub-scores for Lower Body Strength (adjusted difference: 2.84, 95% CI: -0.21 to 5.90; p = 0.074; Cohen's d = 0.517) and Balance & Coordination (adjusted difference: 3.34, 95% CI: -0.09 to 6.79; p = 0.063; Cohen's d = 0.541). The PCS intervention showed potential for improving physical function in older adults in areas critical for maintaining mobility and independence. While trends were favourable, the results did not reach statistical significance.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04861831; date of registration: April 27, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.