ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Genomic characterization of tumor mutational burden-high breast carcinomas.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast cancer immunogenicity as a spectrum: evolving concepts and therapeutic implications.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Spatial ecotype in tumor immune exclusion: from spatial architecture to therapeutic strategies.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Cancer-immunity cycle-based molecular subtypes in breast cancer predict the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Nanobioconjugate Trispecific Antibody Augments Antitumor Immunity of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a potential surrogate for neoantigen load and an indicator of immune checkpoint (IC)-blockade response; however, its precise significance in breast cancer (BC) is not fully understood. Here, we comprehensively characterized the genomic repertoire of BCs with a TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb (TMB-high [n = 527]) to identify putative predictors of importance. The predominant mutational signature was apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) in 64.7% of tumors. TMB-high BCs were enriched in KMT2C, ARID1A, PTEN, NF1, and RB1 alterations, which are associated with APOBEC mutagenesis. Further identified were loss-of-function ARID1A and PTEN alterations, which are linked to immune cell exclusion. ESR1 p.E380Q prevailed among all ESR1 hotspot mutations, supporting APOBEC-mediated effects. Finally, mutations in DNA damage response and repair genes were seen at a higher frequency than in non-TMB-high BCs. These findings provide justification for exploring combined pharmacologic inhibition to improve IC-based efficacy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.