Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Recent advances in film dosimetry for quality assurance in microbeam radiation therapy.

Sarvenaz Keshmiri, Gaëtan Lemaire, Adélie André, Florian Thevenet, Alexandre Ocadiz, Nicolas Rosuel, Benjamin Huffschmidt, Yacine Bencheikh, Mostafa Ghafooryan-Sangchooli, Paolo Pellicioli and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarvenaz KeshmiriUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Gaëtan LemaireUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Adélie AndréUniv. Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC UMR5821, Grenoble, 38000, France.
Florian ThevenetUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Alexandre OcadizUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Nicolas RosuelUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Benjamin HuffschmidtUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Yacine BencheikhUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Mostafa Ghafooryan-SangchooliUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Paolo PellicioliID17 Biomedical Beamline, ESRF-The European Synchrotron, 71 avenue des Martyrs, Grenoble, 38000, France.
Raphaël SerducUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France.
Jean-François AdamUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA07 STROBE, 2280 rue de la piscine, Saint-Martin d'Hères, 38400, France. jean-francois.adam@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer (INCA - PCSI/2023/IODA-Master/23CP088-00/ADAMLabEx PRIMES (ANR-11-LABX-0063/ANR-1-IDEX-0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) is currently on the verge of entering the clinical phase, necessitating robust quality assurance (QA) with appropriate dosimeters to ensure patient safety. However, MRT dosimetry presents significant challenges due to its intrinsic characteristics, including steep dose gradients with alternating high and low dose regions-referred to as peaks and valleys (valley doses comprising only 5-7% of peak doses)-micrometric resolution requirements, the use of low-to-medium energy X-rays and extremely high dose rates of up to 16 kGy/s. Currently, Gafchromic films are considered the gold standard for patient QA. Previous studies have reported discrepancies of 10-30% between measured and calculated peak and valley doses. This study aimed to evaluate four types of films (EBT-3, EBT-XD, MD-V3, and HD-V2) to determine the most suitable option for MRT QA. To support dosimetric benchmarking, the microDiamond detector was used as the reference for MRT measurements, and the ionization chamber for broad beam reference dosimetry. Discrepancies were observed between calculated and film-measured peak and valley doses, and several hypotheses were proposed to explain these differences. Possible causes include simplifications in dose calculation engines, intrinsic limitations of the films, uncertainties in experimental setups, and variations in readout methods. The study suggests that MD-V3 may be the most suitable film for MRT dosimetry, offering a dynamic range that effectively covers both peak and valley doses.

Indexed as

Film DosimetryQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiotherapyHumansRadiotherapy Dosage

Identifiers

PMID40775418
PMCPMC12332172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.