Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775390›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Current role of artificial intelligence and machine learning: is their application feasible in pediatric upper airway obstructive disorders?

Virginia Dallari, Marella Reale, Matteo Fermi, Cristoforo Fabbris, Eleonora M C Trecca

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Three-dimensional printing and cochlear implantation: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT models in salivary gland disease: a multimodal vignette-based evaluation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Virginia DallariDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.
Marella RealeGOS, Young Otolaryngologists Group of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rome, Italy. realemarella@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9716-8605
Matteo FermiGOS, Young Otolaryngologists Group of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rome, Italy.
Cristoforo FabbrisGOS, Young Otolaryngologists Group of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora M C TreccaGOS, Young Otolaryngologists Group of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this article was to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the role and reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in the diagnosis, management, and potential treatment of pediatric upper airway obstruction (UAO).

methodsThis PRISMA-based review searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language studies on pediatric UAO (≤ 18 years) using AI/ML. Non-original works, unrelated topics, mixed-age studies, and those without AI/ML were excluded.

resultsOut of 76 identified articles, 27 were included in the review. Most studies on AI and ML focused on pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), particularly diagnosis and severity classification.Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were the most common approach, used in 29% of studies. The most frequent input modality was nocturnal blood oxygen saturation (SpO₂) signals (44%), followed by clinical parameters (14.8%), electrocardiography (ECG) (7.4%), and polysomnography (PSG) data (7.4%). Model performance varied based on input data and study design. Advanced methods for OSA show high accuracy: deep learning (88.8%), actigraphy/oximetry (96%), and smartphone oximeters (> 79%). The Sunrise algorithm reached 100% sensitivity for severe OSA. Limitations across current studies include heterogeneous patient populations, small sample sizes, and a predominant focus on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which may restrict the generalizability of the findings.

conclusionsIn pediatric sleep medicine, ML models have focused on diagnosis mainly using physiological signalsand XGBoost/Support Vector Machines (SVM) for clinical data. No studies addressed treatment or monitoring, and challenges like data diversity, validation, and feasibility remain.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningSleep Apnea, ObstructiveChildHumansReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceChildrenMachine learningObstructive sleep apneaOtolaryngologyPediatricUpper airway obstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.