Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775385›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery & related research2025

Retrospective comparison of chloroprocaine and mepivacaine in spinal anesthesia for same-day discharge TKA.

Noah Gilreath, Jonathan Liu, Cameron Thomson, Mohammad Daher, Sandi Caus, Harrison Dunn, Valentin Antoci, Thomas Barrett, Eric Cohen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery & related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07239999 (Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Spinal Anesthesia With 1% Chloroprocaine Versus 1% Mepivacaine in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07239999 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Spinal Anesthesia With 1% Chloroprocaine Versus 1% Mepivacaine in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorNova Scotia Health AuthorityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled170ConditionsRecovery Period, AnesthesiaArmsMepivacaine Injection, Chloroprocaine Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noah GilreathUniversity Orthopedics, Inc, 1 Kettle Point Ave, East Providence, RI, 02914, USA. noah.gilreath@umassmed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7937-602X
Jonathan LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Cameron ThomsonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Mohammad DaherDepartment of Orthopaedics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Sandi CausDepartment of Orthopaedics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Harrison DunnDepartment of Orthopaedics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Valentin AntociUniversity Orthopedics, Inc, 1 Kettle Point Ave, East Providence, RI, 02914, USA.
Thomas BarrettUniversity Orthopedics, Inc, 1 Kettle Point Ave, East Providence, RI, 02914, USA.
Eric CohenUniversity Orthopedics, Inc, 1 Kettle Point Ave, East Providence, RI, 02914, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChloroprocaine is a rapid, short-acting spinal anesthetic that may facilitate quicker postoperative recovery in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, limited literature exists regarding its use in patients undergoing same-day discharge (SDD) TKA. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes and safety of chloroprocaine compared with those of mepivacaine.

methodsThis retrospective study of 178 patients who underwent primary TKA at a single ambulatory surgery center from March 2022 to June 2023 compared chloroprocaine (n = 114) and mepivacaine (n = 64) spinal anesthesia. Surgical outcomes, including estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, discharge time, 90-day emergency department visits, and 90-day readmissions, were evaluated. In addition, anesthesia-related complications such as hypotension, bradycardia, urinary retention, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) outcomes were recorded. Continuous variables between the chloroprocaine and mepivacaine groups were compared via independent sample t-tests, whereas categorical variables were analyzed via chi-squared tests. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThere were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The chloroprocaine group had a significantly shorter operative time (73.1 versus 84.9 min, p < 0.001) and faster discharge (3.7 versus 4.2 h, p < 0.001), with no difference in EBL. Patients in the chloroprocaine group had a lower incidence of urinary retention (2.5 versus 15.6%, p = 0.004), a lower proportion of patients who needed a urinary catheter (2.6 versus 14.1%, p = 0.004), and fewer postoperative complaints of numbness (19.3 versus 39.1%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in surgical complications.

conclusionsCompared with mepivacaine, chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia for SDD TKA was associated with lower rates of urinary retention, a reduced need for urinary catheterization, fewer neurological complaints in the PACU, and faster discharge times. No differences were observed in surgical outcomes between the groups, and there were no instances of unplanned direct admissions. These results suggest that chloroprocaine can be safely used as a reliable alternative to mepivacaine in outpatient TKA.

Indexed as

Length of stayPerioperative outcomesSame-day dischargeShort-acting spinal anesthesiaTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40775385
PMCPMC12333157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.