Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775365›Full record

SynthesisAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

Machine learning applications in vascular neuroimaging for the diagnosis and prognosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Valerie Lohner, Amanpreet Badhwar, Flavie E Detcheverry, Cindy L García, Helena M Gellersen, Zahra Khodakarami, René Lattmann, Rui Li, Audrey Low, Claudia Mazo and 10 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Valerie LohnerCardiovascular Epidemiology of Aging, Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. valerie.lohner@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5589-9701
Amanpreet BadhwarMultiomics Investigation of Neurodegenerative Diseases (MIND) lab, 4545 Queen Mary Road, Montréal, QC, H3W 1W6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-3395
Flavie E DetcheverryMultiomics Investigation of Neurodegenerative Diseases (MIND) lab, 4545 Queen Mary Road, Montréal, QC, H3W 1W6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9909-9754
Cindy L GarcíaMcGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St W, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada.
Helena M GellersenGerman Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipziger Str. 44/Haus 64, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7544-2311
Zahra KhodakaramiDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, 240 Skirkanich Hall, 210 S 33rd St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
René LattmannGerman Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipziger Str. 44/Haus 64, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1620-2007
Rui LiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XY, UK.
Audrey LowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9960-9849
Claudia MazoDublin City University, Collins Ave Ext, Whitehall, Dublin 9, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-8964
Amelie MetzMcGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St W, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9104-5383
Olivier ParentMcGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St W, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3177-0353
Veronica PhillipsUniversity of Cambridge Medical Library, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-9434
Usman SaeedInstitute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Sean Y W TanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XY, UK.
Stefano TamburinDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-2187
David J LlewellynUniversity of Exeter, Stocker Rd, Exeter, EX4 4PY, UK.
Timothy RittmanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-6937
Sheena WatersQueen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-2272
Jose BernalGerman Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipziger Str. 44/Haus 64, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3167-5134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a common neurological condition that contributes to strokes, dementia, disability, and mortality worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the use of neuroimaging CSVD markers in machine learning (ML) based diagnosis and prognosis of cognitive impairment and dementia, and identify both methodological changes over time and barriers to clinical translation.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched for original studies that used both neuroimaging CSVD markers and ML methods for diagnosing and prognosing neurodegenerative diseases (preregistration in PROSPERO: CRD42022366767). Each paper was independently reviewed by a pair of reviewers at all stages, with a third consulted to resolve conflicts. We meta-analysed the effectiveness of ML models to distinguish healthy controls from Alzheimer’s dementia and cognitive impairment, using area under the curve (AUC) as the performance metric.

resultsWe identified 75 studies: 43 on diagnosis, 27 on prognosis, and 5 on both. Nearly 60% of studies were published in the past two years, reflecting a growing interest in using CSVD markers in ML-based diagnosis and prognosis of neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer’s dementia. This rising interest may be linked to the strong performance of such models: according to our meta-analysis, ML approaches using CSVD markers perform well in differentiating healthy controls from Alzheimer’s dementia (AUC 0.88 [95%-CI 0.85–0.92]) and cognitive impairment (AUC 0.84 [95%-CI 0.74–0.95]). However, the growing interest has not been matched by methodological rigour: only 16 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis due to inconsistent reporting, only five assessed the generalisability of their models on external datasets, and six lacked clear diagnostic criteria.

conclusionsInterest in incorporating CSVD markers into ML models for neurodegenerative disease classification is on the rise, and their performance suggests that this is worth further exploration. Serious methodological issues, including inconsistent reporting, limited generalisability testing, and other potential biases, are unfortunately common and hinder further adoption. Our targeted recommendations provide a roadmap to accelerate the integration of ML into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cerebral Small Vessel DiseasesCognitive DysfunctionDementiaMachine LearningNeuroimagingHumansPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisAlzheimer’s dementiaArtificial intelligenceCerebral small vessel diseaseCognitive impairmentDementiaMachine learningNeurodegenerative diseasesNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID40775365
PMCPMC12330124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.