ArticleImplementation science communications2025
Developing implementation strategies for digital ICU diaries targeting ICU professionals: an implementation mapping approach.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Digital Diaries Are Changing Communication and Recovery in the Intensive Care Unit and Beyond.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Digital Transformation in Critical Care: Implications for Quality of Care, Infection Control, and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital Intensive Care Unit (ICU) diaries can enhance the mental health of ICU survivors and their relatives by bridging memory gaps, improving understanding of ICU experiences, and providing emotional support. However, integrating digital diaries into routine ICU practice poses challenges, including privacy concerns, time constraints, and limited staff motivation. To date, no standardized implementation strategy exists. This study aimed to develop a theory-driven, stepwise implementation guide.
methodsA methodological, iterative developmental design was employed, guided by the Implementation Mapping (IM) framework. The first four IM steps structured the process. Step 1 involved a needs assessment using prior qualitative and quantitative studies, including focus groups and a survey with ICU professionals, to identify barriers and facilitators. In step 2, a collaborative session defined implementation outcomes, performance objectives, and key determinants for change. Step 3 involved selecting theory-based methods and implementation strategies using the taxonomy of behavior change methods. In step 4, these strategies were translated into practical actions and materials to support implementation.
resultsThe needs assessment (Step 1) identified 23 facilitators and 40 barriers, with survey findings confirming these insights. In step 2, fidelity, adoption, and sustainability were established as key implementation outcomes, with seven performance objectives linked to determinants such as knowledge, attitudes, and motivation. Step 3 resulted in the selection of twelve theory-based methods, including active learning, peer role modeling, and perspective-shifting, to inform strategy development. Finally, step 4 produced a structured implementation guide, adaptable to local contexts, designed to support ICU teams and champions in adopting and sustaining digital ICU diaries.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the value of Implementation Mapping for developing theory-driven implementation strategies for digital ICU diaries. The resulting guide systematically addresses barriers and facilitators, offering a scalable model for integrating digital health innovations into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.