ArticleBMC health services research2025
Machine learning based classification of catastrophic health expenditures: a cross-sectional study of Korean low-income households.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study on the effect of catastrophic health expenditures on socially vulnerable groups.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the National Health Insurance (NHI) system implemented in South Korea, concerns persist regarding access to health coverage for low-income households. To address this issue, this study aims to use machine learning-based data mining techniques to classify whether such households will face catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs).
methodsA total of 4,031 low-income people were extracted using 2019 data from the Korea Health Panel Survey. The classification model was developed using four machine learning algorithms: Random Forest, Gradient boosting, Decision tree, Ridge regression, Neural network, and AdaBoost. Ten-fold cross validation was carried out to ensure the reliability of the analysis results. The model was evaluated based on the Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) as well as accuracy, precision, recall, and F-1 score.
resultsThe study's findings revealed that the incidence of CHE was 26.2% in low-income households. The AdaBoost model had the highest classifiable power. It showed AUROC of 89.8%, accuracy of 83.1%, precision of 82.4%, recall of 83.1, and F1 score of 82.1%. The study found that economic activity, chronic disease, and age were significant factors that could lead to CHEs. Therefore, individuals over 65, with chronic conditions, and unemployed had the highest likelihood of developing CHE.
conclusionIt is essential to identify low-income households that are at risk of CHEs in advance before facing the economic burden. This research is expected to provide fundamental data that can aid in developing an integrated support program to prevent and manage CHEs more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.