ReviewBMC microbiology2025
Recent advances in the understanding, detection and therapeutic targeting of bacterial recalcitrance.
Review in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Insights into Antibiotic Resistance in UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The arms race in bacteria-phage interaction: deciphering bacteria defense and phage anti-defense mechanisms through metagenomics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a growing threat for modern medicine, making treatment of infectious diseases increasingly tedious. However, even non-resistant bacteria can survive treatment and cause recurrent infections. This phenomenon is often due to non-proliferating bacteria able to survive the treatment and to resume infection afterwards, also called recalcitrant bacteria. Bacterial recalcitrance, which encompasses tolerance and persistence, is defined by increased survival of bacteria in the presence of antimicrobial agents. In contrast to resistance, the mechanisms underlying recalcitrance are only partially understood. In this review, we summarise the recent advances in the understanding of recalcitrance, its detection, as well as anti-recalcitrance therapies that have been developed. Recalcitrance is thought to be caused by a reduction of bacterial metabolism, mostly driven by stringent and SOS responses, leading to bacterial dormancy. These dormant bacteria escape the action of many antibiotics, preventing the complete resolution of infection. However, strategies have been proposed to tackle recalcitrance. Recalcitrant bacteria are susceptible to drugs whose action is independent of metabolic activity, such as membrane-targeting compounds. Inhibitors blocking the entry of bacteria into dormancy or locking bacteria in a permanent state of dormancy could help avoid recurrence of the infection. Dormant bacteria could also be forced to resume growth through supply of nutrients or signalling molecules. A phage specifically targeting dormant bacteria was recently described and may be an important tool to fight bacterial recalcitrance. Recalcitrance has been neglected for a long time, being in the shadow of resistance. However, both phenomena need to be further investigated in the future to develop a complete array of antibacterial agents that will allow to permanently eradicate all types of bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.