ArticleScientific reports2025
Accurate segmentation of localized fuel cladding chemical interaction layers in SEM micrographs with deep learning method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
U-Zr metallic fuels are promising fuel candidates for fast reactor applications. Fuel/cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) is a random, localized, complex interdiffusion phenomenon occurring at the fuel cladding interface under irradiation, thinning the cladding wall. This interaction has been recognized as a limiting factor in deploying metal fuels to achieve higher burnup under steady state operations. The post irradiation examination of Experimental Breeder Reactor II and Fast Flux Test Facility fuel pins with different irradiation conditions have been the primary method for investigating FCCI in metal fuels, utilizing various characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This study compared several computer vision and deep learning approaches for the automated segmentation of FCCI layers in SEM micrographs. We deployed and compared state-of-the-art deep learning models for the task of FCCI layer segmentation in SEM micrographs. A deep learning based end-to-end method proved its capability to enable rapid and accurate segmentation of FCCI in as-collected SEM micrographs, making it highly suitable for real-time applications to automate data analysis. The average segmentation mAP achieves a high performance of 90.8% for dozens of FCCI layers. Furthermore, the method reported in this study is extendable to segmentation tasks for other materials with similar resolution, texture, and contrast characteristics, paving the way for accelerated and automated analysis in characterization analysis and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.