ArticleScientific reports2025
ITGAV as a promising diagnostic, immunological, and prognostic biomarker in pan-cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrin αV (ITGAV) plays a key role in cell adhesion, migration, and immune regulation, and is implicated in tumor progression. However, its comprehensive expression profile and functional relevance across different cancers remain poorly understood. We conducted an integrative pan-cancer analysis of ITGAV using data from TCGA, GTEx, CCLE, and other public databases. Expression, diagnostic value (via ROC analysis), and prognostic significance (via Cox and Kaplan-Meier analyses of OS, DSS, PFS, and DFS) were assessed. We further explored ITGAV's correlation with immune cell infiltration and immune-related genes, its predictive role in immunotherapy response based on immunophenoscore (IPS), and its drug-binding potential through molecular docking. (1) ITGAV was significantly overexpressed in multiple cancer types including LIHC, COAD, and STAD. (2) ROC analysis confirmed its strong diagnostic value, particularly in HNSC, UCEC, and ESCA. (3) High ITGAV expression was associated with poorer survival outcomes in most cancers, while a protective role was observed in KIRC. (4) ITGAV expression was positively correlated with immune cell infiltration and co-expressed with immune-activating and immunosuppressive genes. (5) The expression level of ITGAV correlates with the IPS score, suggesting its predictive value for the benefit of immunotherapy. (6) Molecular docking identified strong binding affinities between ITGAV and six candidate compounds, including gemcitabine and pioglitazone. Our findings demonstrate that ITGAV is a promising biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy prediction across cancers. Its immunological associations and druggability highlight its potential as a candidate therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.