Trial reportCNS drugs2025
Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Drop Seizures in Patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome Treated with Cannabidiol: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Clinical Trials.
Trial report in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P; CBD) as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in Children and Adults.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P; CBD) as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in Children and Adults.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannabidiol in Neurology: Current Insights and Translational Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIn clinical trials of patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), a ≥ 50% reduction in drop seizure frequency is generally accepted as a key endpoint. However, smaller reductions (< 50%) may yet be impactful for patients in real-world settings. This exploratory analysis evaluated the threshold for a clinically important response in drop seizures that is associated with the Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scale score in patients with LGS treated with cannabidiol (CBD) oral solution and assessed the suitability of CGIC as an anchor for meaningful change.
methodsThis exploratory post hoc analysis included patients with LGS (N = 215, age 2-55 years) receiving CBD (Epidiolex
resultsIn the 215 patients receiving CBD with a CGIC score recorded, CGIC was "slightly improved" or better in 60% of patients, and "much improved" or better in 31% after 14 weeks of treatment. With a CGIC rating of "slightly improved" or better, the best threshold for a clinically important response in drop seizure reduction was - 30.6% (57.7% of patients). Mean and median percentage reductions in drop seizures were - 46.9% and - 58.6%, respectively. Using "much improved" or better, the best threshold was - 49.6% (40.5% of patients). Mean and median percentage reductions in drop seizures were - 57.6% and - 66.0%, respectively. Spearman's correlation was 0.47.
conclusionAnchoring to CGIC of "slightly improved" or better, the threshold for a clinically meaningful reduction in drop seizure frequency was 31%, suggesting that a 50% cutoff may overlook patients with meaningful improvements in their overall condition, as perceived by their caregivers. CGIC scores, although potentially less nuanced than other standardized clinical assessments, were appropriate anchors to determine thresholds. This exploratory analysis may help contextualize clinical trial data to better understand potential patient benefit attained by reductions in drop seizure frequency observed in real-world settings that are < 50%. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02224560 and NCT02224690.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.