SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025
Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease following esophageal atresia surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Morbidity After Repair of Type C Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Pediatric Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term medical support after definitive surgery for esophageal atresia: analysis using a national inpatient database in Japan.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent complication following esophageal atresia (EA) repair, with high recurrence rates and frequent treatment failures despite advancements in medical and surgical management. Effective intervention is crucial to prevent symptom relapse and long-term morbidity. This systematic review, conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science with additional manual reference screening, included 33 studies encompassing 6,167 patients. 27 studies were retrospective cohort analyses evaluating anti-reflux surgery (ARS) outcomes and complications, while a few assessed GERD prevalence and risk factors influencing ARS success or failure. GERD prevalence in EA patients ranges from 25 to 80%, with uncertain long-term efficacy of medical therapy and dietary modifications. Fundoplication, previously performed routinely, is now selectively recommended following a multidisciplinary evaluation to differentiate GERD from alternative causes such as esophageal dysmotility, aspiration, or recurrent fistulas. Approximately 40% of EA patients require ARS, yet failure rates range from 7.8% to 47%. Identified risk factors for failure include male sex, prior abdominal surgery, long-gap EA, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Laparoscopic fundoplication, though increasingly adopted, has higher failure rates than open Nissen fundoplication in complex cases. Despite surgical intervention, GERD recurrence remains a concern, necessitating long-term surveillance. While open Nissen fundoplication remains the gold standard, persistent symptoms highlight the need for large-scale, randomized controlled trials to refine GERD management and optimize surgical decision-making in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40775173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.