Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Venous hemodynamics during blood flow restriction exercise: Impact of cuff type and arm position.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of autoregulated and non-autoregulated blood flow restriction on vastus medialis oblique responses during low-load resistance exercise.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBlood flow restriction (BFR) training is an exercise training modality to accelerate fatigue in exercising limbs by restricting blood flow. Although arterial inflow has been studied, its impact on venous hemodynamics remains unclear. This study examined the effects of cuff type and arm position on venous hemodynamics during BFR exercise.
methodsTwenty-five young adults completed a randomized, crossover trial performing rhythmic handgrip exercises at 50% of maximum voluntary contraction under three conditions: no cuff (control), narrow semi-elastic (SEP) pneumatic band, and wide-rigid (WR) blood pressure cuff. Different arm positions in relation to the heart were used to account for the effect of gravity and blood pooling on the skeletal muscle pump.
resultsWR produced greater fluid retention vs SEP and No cuff. In No cuff, the increment in forearm volume was greater with the arm placed at and below the heart compared with the arm above the heart (p < 0.05). Such differences were not observed across arm positions with the BFR cuffs. Mean venous blood velocity was greater in No cuff than in SEP and WR (p < 0.001), with no differences between SEP and WR in any arm positions. In No cuff, peak venous blood velocity and venous diameter were greater when the arm was placed below the heart. No such trend was observed with the BFR cuffs. Venous diameter was greater in SEP and WR than in No cuff (p < 0.05).
conclusionAlthough venous hemodynamics are not affected by the types of cuffs, WR cuffs appear to induce greater fluid pooling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40775109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.