ReviewJournal of human genetics2026
Genetic insights into the origin, admixture, and migration of the early Austronesian peoples.
Review in Journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is understood that Austronesian ancestors appeared in Taiwan ~6 thousand years ago (Kya), and later expanded beyond Taiwan, but their early origins and relationships with people outside Taiwan remain uncertain. By reconstructing phylogenetic patterns and phylogeographical distribution from mitochondrial and Y haplogroups and genome-wide data, new evidence shows that the Pre-Austronesians may have originated in the coastal southeastern China (centered on Fujian) during the very early Neolithic Age (>10Kya) and lived on the marine subsistence in addition to hunting-gathering. They subsequently mixed with some ancient northern Chinese (from Shandong) and introduced mixed millets and rice cultivation, forming the Proto-Austronesian people ~7-10Kya. Later, Early Austronesians (~4-7Kya) evolved and migrated to Taiwan (~6Kya), and then spread to Island Southeast Asia (ISEA), Champa, southern Thailand, Madagascar, and Oceania via the Philippines (~4.1Kya). The second source is the Austroasiatic ancestors, who originated in southern China in the early Neolithic Age and migrated to the ISEA via the Mainland Southeast Asia and Malay Peninsula in the late Neolithic Age. They mixed with the core Austronesian speakers from Taiwan to become Austronesian speakers, and spread to Oceania. Linguistic and archaeological findings also support the Austronesian origins and genetic prehistory. Most recently, some Austronesians of ISEA have mixed with newcomers from South Asia. The Austronesian ancestors neither originated in the ISEA nor migrated directly from mainland China to the Philippines, also has nothing to do with the so-called "two-layer" hypothesis. Future research requires more Paleolithic and Neolithic genetic evidence, improved genetic age estimates, and multidisciplinary consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40775104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.