ArticleNature methods2025
Morphological map of under- and overexpression of genes in human cells.
Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- KSTITCH links cellular morphology and gene expression in spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in drug discovery - what it is, where we stand and the path forward.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Progress and new challenges in image-based profiling.Molecular systems biology · 2026Review
- MultiPert: An adversarial alignment and dual attention framework for single-cell multi-omics perturbation prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A Framework for Autonomous AI-Driven Drug Discovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Insulin Resistance and Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Large scale compound selection guided by cell painting reveals activity cliffs and functional relationships.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Screening Coupled with AI-Driven Target Deconvolution Identifies α-Terthienyl as a Dual DPP-IV/HSD17β13 Modulator with Efficacy in a Mouse Model of MASLD.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
56 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell Painting images offer valuable insights into a cell's state and enable many biological applications, but publicly available arrayed datasets only include hundreds of genes perturbed. The JUMP Cell Painting Consortium perturbed roughly 75% of the protein-coding genome in human U-2 OS cells, generating a rich resource of single-cell images and extracted features. These profiles capture the phenotypic impacts of perturbing 15,243 human genes, including overexpressing 12,609 genes (using open reading frames) and knocking out 7,975 genes (using CRISPR-Cas9). Here we mitigated technical artifacts by rigorously evaluating data processing options and validated the dataset's robustness and biological relevance. Analysis of phenotypic profiles revealed previously undiscovered gene clusters and functional relationships, including those associated with mitochondrial function, cancer and neural processes. The JUMP Cell Painting genetic dataset is a valuable resource for exploring gene relationships and uncovering previously unknown functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.