ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Transcriptomic profiling of canine mammarygland tumors reveals subtype-specific and shared differentially expressed mRNAs.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic and microRNA Profiling Suggest a Candidate RIPPLY1-cfa-miR-187 Relationship in Canine Mammary Gland Tumours From Dogs With Confirmed Metastasis.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCanine mammary gland tumors (MGTs) are among the most frequently diagnosed neoplasms in intact female dogs and are increasingly regarded as a potential model of human breast cancer. However, the transcriptomic landscape across distinct histological subtypes remains poorly characterized. To explore the molecular alterations underlying MGT subtypes and to identify potential biomarkers, we performed transcriptomic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHOD AND
resultA total of 18 canine MGT samples were analyzed using NGS. mRNA expression levels were compared between three groups: dogs with benign mixed tumor, adenoma, or carcinoma, and healthy controls. DEGs were identified from NGS reads with the Empirical Analysis of DGE tool (CLC genomic workbench) and subjected to functional enrichment analysis. A total of 47 DEGs were identified across MGT subtypes. Among these, two genes, overexpressed gene ENSCAFG00845029941 and underexpressed gene FGL2, were selected for validation via quantitative RT-PCR based on statistical significance and biological relevance. DEG clustering was observed on chromosomes 20 (carcinoma group) and 26 (benign mixed tumor and adenoma groups). Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses revealed enrichment in pathways related to muscle development and calcium ion binding.
conclusionWe potentially implicated FGL2 and ENSCAFG00845029941 as DEGs involved in multi-subtype oncogenesis for canine MGTs, as novel findings. DEGs on chromosome 26 may be implicated in benign tumor oncogenesis, and those on chromosome 20 may be similarly implicated in carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40775071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.