Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775067›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2025

Computational mechanisms of neuroimaging biomarkers uncovered by multicenter resting-state fMRI connectivity variation profile.

Okito Yamashita, Ayumu Yamashita, Yuji Takahara, Yuki Sakai, Yasumasa Okamoto, Go Okada, Masahiro Takamura, Motoaki Nakamura, Takashi Itahashi, Takashi Hanakawa and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Okito YamashitaRIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan. okito.yamashita@riken.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6039-3657
Ayumu YamashitaBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-2919
Yuji TakaharaBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki SakaiBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-8548
Yasumasa OkamotoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Go OkadaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Masahiro TakamuraDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9742-152X
Motoaki NakamuraMedical Institute of Developmental Disabilities Research, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi ItahashiMedical Institute of Developmental Disabilities Research, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7606-7090
Takashi HanakawaDepartment of Integrated Neuroanatomy and Neuroimaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-8214
Hiroki TogoDepartment of Integrated Neuroanatomy and Neuroimaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yujiro YoshiharaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiya MuraiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-8188
Tomohisa OkadaHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-5677
Jin NarumotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidehiko TakahashiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruto TakagishiBrain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5143-9289
Koichi HosomiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kiyoto KasaiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4443-4535
Naohiro OkadaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-2758
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1180-2629
Hiroshi ImamizuBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuya HayashiLaboratory for Brain Connectomics Imaging, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7639-0197
Shinsuke KoikeThe International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-236X
Saori C TanakaBrain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-5051
Mitsuo KawatoRIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8185-1197

Funding

MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJMS2291MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP19H05726 and 23H00414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) is increasingly used to develop biomarkers for psychiatric disorders. Despite progress, development of the reliable and practical FC biomarker remains an unmet goal, particularly one that is clinically predictive at the individual level with generalizability, robustness, and accuracy. In this study, we propose a new approach to profile each connectivity from diverse perspective, encompassing not only disorder-related differences but also disorder-unrelated variations attributed to individual difference, within-subject across-runs, imaging protocol, and scanner factors. By leveraging over 1500 runs of 10-min resting-state data from 84 traveling-subjects across 29 sites and 900 participants of the case-control study with three psychiatric disorders, the disorder-related and disorder-unrelated FC variations were estimated for each individual FC. Using the FC profile information, we evaluated the effects of the disorder-related and disorder-unrelated variations on the output of the multi-connectivity biomarker trained with ensemble sparse classifiers generalizable to the multicenter data. Our analysis revealed hierarchical variations in individual functional connectivity, ranging from within-subject across-run variations, individual differences, disease effects, inter-scanner discrepancies, and protocol differences, which were drastically inverted by the sparse machine-learning algorithm. We found this inversion mainly attributed to suppression of both individual difference and within-subject across-runs variations relative to the disorder-related difference by weighted-summation of the selected FCs and ensemble averaging. This comprehensive approach will provide an analytical tool to develop reliable individual-level biomarkers.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAdultBiomarkersBrainCase-Control StudiesConnectomeFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysRestBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40775067
PMCPMC12532608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.