Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775046›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Impact of midwife continuity of carer on stillbirth rate and first feed in England.

Chris Roebuck, Jane Sandall, Robert West, Charlotte Atherden, Kate Parkyn, Owen Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data Resource Profile: Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS).International journal of population data science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris RoebuckSchool of Computer Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Chris.Roebuck@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7825-9093
Jane SandallSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, 10th Floor, North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-743X
Robert WestLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-3654
Charlotte AtherdenNHS England, Leeds, UK.
Kate ParkynNHS England, Leeds, UK.
Owen JohnsonSchool of Computer Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. O.A.Johnson@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3998-541X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2017 NHS England started rolling out a model where women have continuity of carer with the same midwifery team throughout the perinatal period. This study uses national data to test whether women of different groups receiving midwife continuity of carer had lower stillbirth rates and higher rates of a first feed of breast milk than women receiving standard care.

methodsWe compared the two outcomes for women placed on the midwife continuity of carer pathway by 24 weeks and women receiving standard care in England, with logistic regression standardising between groups. We used the Maternity Services Dataset covering 922,149 women conceiving between 2020 and 2022.

resultsCombining all demographic groups, women on a midwife continuity of carer pathway have a higher first feed of breast milk rate (p < 0.001), but do not show a difference in stillbirth rate, compared to women receiving standard care. However, Black women on this pathway have lower stillbirth rates (p = 0.047) compared to Black women receiving standard care, the only demographic group showing a difference. Women with no antenatal appointment at all by 24 weeks have much higher stillbirth rates than those with an appointment (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe findings that midwifery continuity of carer increases the first feed of breast milk uptake, which has health benefits. It may decrease stillbirth rates for Black women. Both findings inform future policy development and research. Further investigation and outreach around women not coming forward for timely antenatal care may also be beneficial.

Identifiers

PMID40775046
PMCPMC12332168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.