Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775028›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Application of the metaheuristic algorithms to quantify the GSI based on the RMR classification.

Pouya Koureh Davoodi, Farnusch Hajizadeh, Mohammad Rezaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pouya Koureh DavoodiDepartment of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Farnusch HajizadehDepartment of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Mohammad RezaeiDepartment of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. m.rezaei@uok.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of rock masses is an essential task in earth sciences applications. Among various classification systems, the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) and Geological Strength Index (GSI) are the most frequently utilized ones. Unlike the RMR, which is a quantitative classification, GSI is a qualitative system and needs to be converted into a quantitative one as well due to its multiple applicability in both mining and civil engineering projects. With this objective, GSI quantification directly from RMR can be an attractive issue as it remains a complex task still due to the limited accuracy and generalizability of existing empirical models under varying geological conditions. This study addresses this challenge by analyzing data from fourteen different rock types and employing three metaheuristic optimization algorithms, namely Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), to develop predictive models for quantifying GSI based on the RMR. Accordingly, five mathematical GSI-RMR equations including linear, power, exponential, polynomial and logarithmic types were first developed using each algorithm. The resulting equations were assessed using six statistical indicators: R

Indexed as

Geological strength indexGrey wolf optimizationParticle swarm optimizationRock mass ratingSimulated annealing

Identifiers

PMID40775028
PMCPMC12332066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.