ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantitative image analysis of the extracellular matrix of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and high grade dysplasia via two-photon microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural Basis for the Pro-amyloidogenic Action and Ligand Binding of a Novel W72R Variant of Human Apolipoprotein A-I.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) are two different pathological entities; however, they sometimes share similarities in histological structure depending on the context. Thus, distinguishing between the two may require careful examination by a pathologist and consideration of clinical findings. Unlike previous studies on cancer diagnosis using two-photon microscopy, quantitative analysis or machine learning (ML) algorithms need to be used to determine the subtle structural changes in images and the structural features that are statistically meaningful in cancer development. In this study, we aimed to quantitatively distinguish between SCC and HGD using two-photon microscopy combined with ML. Tissue samples were categorized into two groups: Group 1, primary SCC vs. metachronous HGD (SCC-HGD) and Group 2, primary HGD vs. metachronous HGD (HGD-HGD). We quantitatively analyzed second harmonic generation (SHG) and two-photon fluorescence (TPF) signals from two-photon microscopy imaging of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) was used to extract the textural features of the tissue images, and support vector machine (SVM), for classification of the tissue images based on their pathologies. The SHG-based classifiers demonstrated 75%, 84.21%, 95%, and 95.65% for Group 1, Group 2, primary SCC vs. primary HGD, and metachronous HGD (Group 1) vs. metachronous HGD (Group 2), respectively. This integrative approach enabled the characterization of different pathological stages and enhances the understanding of the pathogenic factors involved in the progression of esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.