Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40774718›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Understanding why resident doctors leave the NHS and what can be done to retain them: protocol for a realist synthesis.

Naomi Klepacz, Anna Melvin, Simon Briscoe, Daniele Carrieri, Florence Katie Lock, Priya Patel, Kevin Teoh, Geoff Wong, Karen Mattick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naomi KlepaczMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK n.klepacz@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-8000
Anna MelvinMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Simon BriscoeMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Daniele CarrieriDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3143-8430
Florence Katie LockMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4787-5512
Priya PatelUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, England, UK.
Kevin TeohDepartment of Organizational Psychology, Birkbeck University of London, London, Greater London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-8208
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Karen MattickMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe UK's medical workforce is under increasing strain, and this is compounded by increasing numbers of resident doctors diverging from specialist training pathways, instead entering non-training roles, reducing clinical hours or leaving the profession or UK workforce entirely. These decisions are shaped by both individual motivations and wider structural conditions, including unsatisfactory working conditions, limited flexibility and a perceived lack of support or autonomy. While pursuing alternative career routes offers personal and professional benefits, they can also delay progression to senior clinical roles, contributing to workforce instability. There remains limited understanding of how best to support retention, particularly given the varied contexts, settings and career trajectories of resident doctors. This realist synthesis will examine how, why and in what contexts resident doctors leave the National Health Service, and what interventions might support their retention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This realist synthesis will follow Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards guidance and will be conducted in five iterative steps: (1) identifying existing theories to develop an initial programme theory; (2) undertaking formal and purposive searches to identify relevant UK-based literature; (3) selecting documents based on relevance and rigour; (4) extracting and coding data to support the development of explanatory insights; and (5) synthesising findings using a realist logic of analysis to develop and refine context-mechanism-outcome configurations. An advisory group will guide the review throughout. The final programme theory will inform the development of evidence-based recommendations and design principles to support resident doctor retention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this synthesis of existing literature. Findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conference presentations and accessible formats, including infographics, plain English summaries and blog posts. Target audiences include resident doctors, medical educators, workforce planners and policymakers. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD420251004453.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansState MedicineCareer ChoiceHumansResearch DesignUnited KingdomHealth WorkforceHuman resource managementJob SatisfactionMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID40774718
PMCPMC12336535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.