Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40774276›Full record

ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2025

Diagnosing Type 2 Inflammation in COPD: Comparison of Blood and Sputum Eosinophil Assessment in the University of California Los Angeles COPD Phenotyping Study.

W Blake LeMaster, Sarah A Ingersoll, Hyewon Phee, Renee Wen, Jing Bai, John A Belperio, Russell G Buhr, Jonathan E Phillips, Vyacheslav Palchevskiy, Tiffany Bina and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Evolving Landscape of COPD Typization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

W Blake LeMasterDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Sarah A IngersollAmgen Discovery Research, Thousand Oaks, California, United States.
Hyewon PheeAmgen Discovery Research, Thousand Oaks, California, United States.
Renee WenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Jing BaiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
John A BelperioDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Russell G BuhrDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Jonathan E PhillipsAmgen Discovery Research, Thousand Oaks, California, United States.
Vyacheslav PalchevskiyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Tiffany BinaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Donald P TashkinDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Christopher B CooperDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Igor Z BarjaktarevicDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Funding

AmgenNHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL134025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotyping is an approach for developing tailored therapies. The eosinophilic phenotype is associated with exacerbation risk and response to specific treatments. This study evaluates the relationship between sputum and blood eosinophilia, hypothesizing that sputum eosinophil percentage (SpE%) better reflects disease severity and exacerbation risk than blood eosinophil counts (BEC). Methods: This was a single-center, prospective observational cohort with 107 participants aged 40-80 with clinically diagnosed COPD. Participants completed spirometry, a 6-minute walk test, and questionnaires, and blood and sputum samples were provided at baseline and 3 months. BEC and SpE% were measured via routine complete blood counts and flow cytometric analyses (fluorescence-activated cell sorting [FACS]). Eosinophilic phenotype thresholds were defined as BEC≥300 cells/μL and SpE%≥2%, and associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes were investigated. Results: Adequate sputum specimens were obtained less frequently than blood (60.7% versus 98%). SpE% showed poor repeatability (interclass coefficient 0.36) and poor correlation with FACS (Spearman's 𝜌=0.008, Conclusions: In stable COPD patients, BEC and SpE% did not correlate well, and blood- and sputum-based diagnostic criteria identified different individuals. Defining eosinophilic COPD requires a better understanding of the bio-compartment sampled, testing methods, and cut-off values used.

Indexed as

biomarkersbloodCOPDeosinophilsphenotypessputum

Identifiers

PMID40774276
PMCPMC12614186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.