ArticleJournal of Yeungnam medical science2025
Stress and sleep quality among medical students in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of Yeungnam medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Perceived Stress on Work Engagement Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses: The Mediating Effects of Dispositional Mindfulness and Sleep Quality.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Sleep Quality, Sleep Hygiene Behaviors, and Psychosocial Determinants Among Undergraduate Students in South-Eastern Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- The impact of social support on academic burnout among medical students: the mediating effects of anxiety and depression, and the role of urban-rural differences.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Academic stress and online learning engagement in medical students: the parallel mediating roles of sleep quality and positive academic emotions.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical students experience high levels of stress owing to their demanding academic environment, which can significantly impact their sleep quality. This study aimed to assess the status of stress and sleep quality among medical students in Bangladesh and identify the factors influencing these conditions.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 280 undergraduate medical students selected by stratified random sampling from four medical colleges in Bangladesh. Data were collected using a self-report questionnaire covering sociodemographic details, stress- and sleep-related factors, the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
resultsThe study revealed that 65.7% of students experienced stress, which was categorized as mild (27.5%), moderate (22.1%), or severe (16.1%). Poor sleep quality was prevalent in 72.1% of students, with 48.2% being moderately poor sleepers and 23.9% being very poor sleepers. Factors significantly associated with stress included female sex, higher academic year, lack of physical activity, high parental expectations, academic concerns, lack of a doctor in the family, and parental influence in choosing medical education. Poor sleep quality was significantly linked to stress, female sex, hostel residency, increased screen time before sleep, late dinner, daytime naps, coffee intake, and late-night snacks.
conclusionThis study highlights the high prevalence of stress and poor sleep quality among medical students in Bangladesh. Stress significantly contributes to sleep disturbances, and various lifestyle and academic factors exacerbate these issues. Targeted interventions, including stress management programs and the promotion of healthier sleep, are essential for improving students' well-being and academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.